Senate 2008 Guru: Following the Races
Keeping a close eye on developments in the 2008 U.S. Senate races
Expand the Map!
via ActBlue Election Day 2008 Countdown
via ActBlue Election Day 2008 Countdown
Recent Posts
- Retirement Watch Update
- Monday Morning Miscellany
- Weekend Round-Up
- Texas Draft and NRSC Stagnation
- Talk Now, Results Eventually
- Thursday Night News
- Big Thursday Morning Rundown
- Of the Days
- Tuesday Round-Up
- Monday Round-Up
Democratic Party Links
- Democratic National Committee
- Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
- Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
Democratic Senatorial Incumbents and Candidates
- Alabama:
State Senator Vivian Figures - Alaska:
Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich (considering) - Arkansas:
Senator Mark Pryor - Colorado:
Congressman Mark Udall - Delaware:
Senator Joe Biden - Georgia:
Veteran & former Senate aide Josh Lanier
Ecologist Dr. Rand Knight
Journalist Dale Cardwell
Former State Rep. Maggie Martinez - Idaho:
Former Congressman Larry LaRocco - Illinois:
Senator Richard Durbin - Iowa:
Senator Tom Harkin - Kansas:
Former Senate nominee Lee Jones - Kentucky:
Businessman Greg Fischer
Former state Commerce Secretary Bruce Lunsford
Dr. Michael Cassaro - Louisiana:
Senator Mary Landrieu - Maine:
Congressman Tom Allen - Massachusetts:
Senator John Kerry - Michigan:
Senator Carl Levin - Minnesota:
Commentator Al Franken
Attorney Mike Ciresi
Professor Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer
Former Minneapolis Alderman Dick Franson - Mississippi-A:
Former State Representative Erik Fleming
Perennial candidate Shawn O'Hara - Mississippi-B:
Former Governor Ronnie Musgrove - Montana:
Senator Max Baucus - Nebraska:
Businessman Tony Raimondo
Veteran Larry Marvin
2006 Congressional Nominee Scott Kleeb (considering) - New Hampshire:
Former Governor Jeanne Shaheen - New Jersey:
Senator Frank Lautenberg - New Mexico:
Congressman Tom Udall - North Carolina:
State Senator Kay Hagan
Businessman Jim Neal
Veteran John Ross Hendrix
Businessman Duskin Lassiter
State Board of Education Chair Howard Lee (considering) - Oklahoma:
State Senator Andrew Rice - Oregon:
House Speaker Jeff Merkley
Activist Steve Novick
Real estate broker Candy Neville - Rhode Island:
Senator Jack Reed - South Carolina:
Attorney Michael Cone
Attorney Tom Turnipseed (considering) - South Dakota:
Senator Tim Johnson - Tennessee:
Businessman Kenneth Eaton
Former Knox County Clerk Mike Padgett
Activist Chris Lugo
Former TN-Dems Chair Bob Tuke (considering) - Texas:
State Representative Rick Noriega - Virginia:
Former Governor Mark Warner - West Virginia:
Senator Jay Rockefeller - Wyoming-A: unknown
- Wyoming-B:
Attorney Nick Carter (considering)
Republican Incumbent Primary Challengers
- Alaska:
Businessman David Cuddy
Former Lt. Gov. Loren Leman (considering)
Former state Senate President Mike Miller (considering) - Idaho:
Rancher Rex Rammell
Iraq veteran Scott Syme
Former Caldwell City Councilman Kent Marmon
Businessman Richard Phenneger
Machinist Brian Hefner
Attorney Fred Adams
Former Boise Mayoral candidate Harley Brown
Neal Thompson
Canyon County Commissioner Robert Vasquez (ceased campaign) - Kentucky:
Daniel Essek
1995 GOP Gubernatorial Nominee Larry Forgy (draft effort) - Minnesota:
Former Senator Rod Grams (considering) - Oregon:
1998 GOP Gubernatorial Nominee Bill Sizemore (considering) - South Carolina:
Former Myrtle Beach Mayor Mark McBride
RNC Member Buddy Witherspoon
Air Force veteran John Cina
Computer specialist Tim Carnes
Former Rep. Tommy Hartnett (considering)
State Representative Jeff Duncan (considering) - Texas:
2006 Gubernatorial candidate Larry Kilgore - Wyoming (Barrasso):
Former U.S. Attorney Matt Mead (considering)
Retirements, Resignations, and Passings
- Wayne Allard (R-CO): Announced retirement, 1/15/07
- Craig Thomas (R-WY): Passed away, 6/4/07
- John Warner (R-VA): Announced retirement, 8/31/07
- Chuck Hagel (R-NE): Announced retirement, 9/10/07
- Larry Craig (R-ID): Announced retirement (we think), 10/4/07
- Pete Domenici (R-NM): Announced retirement, 10/4/07
- Trent Lott (R-MS): Announced impending resignation, 11/26/07
Links
- Roadblock Republicans
- DSCC's YouTube Page
- Rothenberg Political Report 2008 Senate Ratings (2/22/08)
- Cook Political Report Senate Race Ratings - PDF (1/17/08)
- CQPolitics Balance of Power Scorecard (8/15/07)
- Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball: Senate '08 Update (7/19/07)
- National Journal 2008 Senate Race Rankings (2/12/07)
- Survey USA Senator Approval Ratings (11/22/06)
- 2008 Senate Race Tracker Wiki
- 2008 Senate Elections Wikipedia Page
- U.S. Senate Seat-Holders Chart, 1978-present
- Pollster.com
- Project Vote Smart
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Senator Chuck Schumer's Positively American
- Americans United for Change
- Empowering Veterans
- Vote Vets
- The Hill
National Blog Roll
- All Spin Zone
- All Things Democrat
- AmericaBlog
- Atrios
- Blue Sunbelt
- Bob Geiger
- Booman Tribune
- Campaign Diaries
- The Carpetbagger Report
- Cliff Schecter
- CQPolitics
- Crooks and Liars
- Daily Kos
- Daily Left
- The Democratic Daily
- Digby
- Election Day 2008
- An Enduring Democratic Majority
- Firedoglake
- The Fix (Washington Post)
- From the Roots (DSCC Blog)
- The Gavel (Speaker Pelosi)
- The Group News Blog
- Gun Toting Liberal
- Hotline Blogometer
- Hotline On Call
- The Huffington Post
- Kicking Ass (DNC Blog)
- Left in the West
- Liberal Values
- MaxSpeak
- MyDD
- The Next Hurrah
- NJDC Blog
- Open Left
- Political Wire
- Politics1
- Progressive Blog Digest
- Rising Hegemon
- Rocky Mountain Report
- The Rothenberg Political Report
- Scholars & Rogues
- The Stakeholder (DCCC Blog)
- Swing State Project
- Talking Points Memo
- Think Progress
- VetVoice
- Wonkette
State Blog Roll
- 43rd State Blues (ID)
- Alaska Pride (AK)
- Badlands Blue (SD)
- Birmingham Blues (AL)
- Bleeding Heartland (IA)
- Bluegrass Report (KY)
- BlueGrass Roots (KY)
- Blue Hampshire (NH)
- Blue Jersey (NJ)
- Blue Mass Group (MA)
- Blue NC (NC)
- Blue Oklahoma (OK)
- Blue Oregon (OR)
- Blue Tide Rising (KS)
- The Bridge (KY)
- Burnt Orange Report (TX)
- Capitol Annex (TX)
- Colorado Confidential (CO)
- Colorado Pols (CO)
- Cotton Mouth (MS)
- Daily Delaware (DE)
- Daily Kingfish (LA)
- Democracy for New Mexico (NM)
- Doc's Political Parlor (AL)
- Heath Haussamen (NM)
- Iowa Progress (IA)
- Joe Monahan (NM)
- KnoxViews (TN)
- Left in Alabama (AL)
- Loaded Orygun (OR)
- Michigan Liberal (MI)
- Minnesota Campaign Report (MN)
- MN Blue (MN)
- MN Publius (MN)
- The MountainGoat Report (ID)
- New Mexico FBIHOP (NM)
- New Nebraska Network (NE)
- North Texas Liberal (TX)
- Not Larry Sabato (VA)
- Prarie State Blue (IL)
- Public Policy Polling (NC)
- Raising Kaine (VA)
- Red State Rebels (ID)
- Rhode Island's Future (RI)
- South Dakota Progressive (SD)
- Square State (CO)
- TennViews (TN)
- Texas Kaos (TX)
- Tondee's Tavern (GA)
- Turn Maine Blue (ME)
- UNO Dems (NE)
- West Virginia Blue (WV)
- Witigonen (OR)
Candidate-Specific Blogs & Sites
Cheering Them On- Blue Sparks in Alabama (AL)
- Draft Horne (1) (KY)
- Draft Horne (2) (KY)
- Draft Brad Miller (NC)
- Draft Crit (KY)
- Draft DeFazio (OR)
- Draft Governor Henry (OK)
- Draft Owen (KY)
- Draft Rick Noriega (TX)
- Draft Scott Kleeb (NE)
- Draft Shaheen (NH)
- Draft Tom Udall (NM)
- NoriegaBlog (Unofficial) (TX)
- Run Andrew Run (OK)
- Stumbo 4 Senate (Unofficial) (KY)
- Tom Allen for Senate (Unofficial) (ME)
- We Want Mike Moore (MS)
- We Want Wyc (GA)
- Bob Schaffer on the Issues (CO)
- Collins Watch (ME)
- Defeat Lindsey Graham (SC)
- Ditch Mitch KY (KY)
- Dump Lindsey.org (SC)
- Dump Lindsey Graham (SC)
- No Hagel (NE)
- Norm Coleman Weasel Meter (MN)
- The Real Wicker (MS)
- Retire Ted (AK)
- Sack Sessions (AL)
- Shifty Schaffer (CO)
- Stop Cornyn (TX)
- Stop Gordon Smith (OR)
- Stop Sununu (NH)
- Sununu Hampshire (NH)
- Toast Graham! (SC)
- Tom Davis Truth (VA)
- What's McConnell Hiding? (KY)
Note: This is a privately run blog, not connected to any political campaign, candidate, committee or organization.
Contact the Senate 2008 Guru at senate2008guru at yahoo dot com.
"We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children."
-Native American proverb
Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
The National Debt: |
YouTube Video Library
Republican Scandals of 2007
On Republican Obstructionism-
NE-Sen: Mike Johanns is a Quitter
MT-Sen: Mike Lange's Obscene Tirade
KY-Sen: DSCC on Mitch McConnell and Iraq
ME-Sen: Americans United for Change on Susan Collins and Iraq
NH-Sen: Americans United for Change on John Sununu and Iraq
MN-Sen: The Difference Between Norm Coleman & Al Franken
VA-Sen: Mark Warner Announces
The Hall of Fame YouTube Political Video: George Allen and "Macaca"
Monday, March 19, 2007
23 Comments:
Unfortunately, your link doesn't go to the original Roll Call article. Here's an excerpt:
QUOTE
The NRSC wants to ensure Dole is on solid ground at the outset of the cycle — allowing the committee to “take her off the table” and not have to worry about her financial footing as the election nears, several Republican leadership sources said.
“She isn’t someone any of us consider to be in danger of losing re-election,” said a Senate GOP leadership aide. “That said, she contributed a lot of money from her own campaign accounts to the NRSC. There’s a sense we should team up and help her.”
At the end of 2006, Dole had just $245,000 on hand, a relatively paltry sum for an incumbent Senator heading into re-election. Sources close to Dole say not only did the North Carolina Republican do very little personal fundraising during her two years at the helm of the NRSC, but she also transferred more than $400,000 from her own campaign accounts to help bolster the NRSC’s coffers.
UNQUOTE
Cool - an anonymous Senate GOP leadership aide says they're not worried about Dole's re-election bid - so she must be in great shape then!
I was adding more context to your post. Dole started out with far less money that most other incumbents, and the reason was because she gave her money to the NRSC last cycle. Now the NRSC is asking GOP Senators to give back.
I would recommend reading the entire Roll Call article.
And given what a comically miserable failure Dole was as NRSC Chair, I can't imagine that GOP Senators, who are already notoriously stingy with their campaign funds, are too enthusiastic about dumping money back to Dole.
You dont release a poll this far out when she has no opposition that is a 20+ point outlier unless you are in a ton of trouble.
Ive said it before, but to reiterate, her money situation at the end of this reporting period will tell us everything we need to know. Above a million and without an opponent she will probably be safe. Anything under 600,000 and she is hanging by a hair.
http://www.salisburypost.com/area/304834647766385.php
Article from January. According to her own campaign she needs to have 3 million dollars on her campaign report in mid April to be safe. So my view is more pessimistic
Maybe you release a poll that shows you with a 63% approval rating to scare off a potential challenger?
Speaking of which, is there anybody who's actually interested in running?
I think we've established that the "63% poll" is a laughably ridiculous outlier.
Is anybody interested in running? I don't doubt it. But what incentive, va blogger, does Bob Etheridge or Brad Miller or any other prime opponent have to get in right now versus two or three months or more from now? Dole's fundraising is obviously languishing - an early opponent would change that.
How do you know her fundraising is languishing when the first numbers from this cycle haven't even been released yet? That's an awfully stupid thing to say.
va blogger, my naive friend, if Dole's fundraising wasn't languishing, why would the NRSC be asking other Republican Senators to offer her some campaign welfare in the first place?!? Out of appreciation for the lousy job she did as NRSC Chair?
If you read the Roll Call article that your story was based on, or even read the excerpt from the article that I posted in this very comment thread, you would see the reason why:
Dole donated over $400K from her warchest to the NRSC near the end of the '06 cycle, and didn't do much personal fundraising at all from '05-'06, leaving her campaign warchest far below what the norm is for a incumbent running for re-election.
Because she gave money to the NRSC, the new folks at the NRSC thought it would be only fair, in return, to direct special attention in the form of cash back to her warchest.
Can you point to any site that has numbers on how well Dole has raised funds this cycle? Of course you can't. Because not only have the numbers not been reported yet, but the fundraising quarter isn't even over!! It ends on 3/31, which makes your comments, at best, premature, and at worst, moronic.
You keep referring to the $400K Dole dumped into the NRSC (to help cover for her awful job as Chair) as though the $400K is make-or-break.
Dole has said she may need to raise as much as $20 million for a re-election bid.
I'll spot you the $400K she dumped into the NRSC - and her fundraising is still languishing.
So what else ya got?
Exactly how much fundraising do you think goes on in the first quarter of a year in which there is no election? Q1 2007 numbers are not, have never been, and never will be an indication of a Senate candidate's ability to fundraise.
The amount of money that a Senate candidate raises in 2008 will surpass 2007 levels so much that what they raised in 2007, especially in the first quarter, doesn't matter in the long run. So why does it matter at all? Because early on, money is a tangible show of strength. Dole is in need of a quick fix, given that her warchest has been depleted to the point where she only has around $250K, a very low amount. That's where the NRSC's recent efforts come in.
Your analysis on this, as always, is clouded by your partisanship. I've told you in three consecutive posts that there is no way to tell, one way or another, how well fundraising is going at this point. I can't tell. You most certainly can't tell. Even the NRSC can't tell. Why? Because not only have the numbers not been reported yet, but here's the most important part:
THE FUNDRAISING CYCLE HAS NOT COMPLETED YET.
You are making judgements on Senator Dole's fundraising, not based on actual numbers, not based on any sound logic, but based on your interpretation of an article that you have yet to understand. And for three consecutive posts, I have explained, in unmatched clarity, how it is simply impossible for anybody to judge a candidate's first quarter fundraising at this moment in time. And for three consecutive posts, you have blissfully ignored what is possible and impossible in favor of your skewed version of the world.
You are either the dumbest person on the Internet today, or a worthless hack. In either case, its a damn shame that your blog is the only one I've been able to find about these races, because they deserve a level of coverage that you have proven yourself to be incapable of.
va blogger - I am actually, for the first time, requesting that you stop replying on this string. Why? Because you're painfully naive.
You said, "Even the NRSC can't tell." suggesting that even the NRSC is ignorant as to Dole's fundraising numbers.
Do you actually think that the NRSC does not know Dole's fundraising numbers up to the minute and down to the last cent? Seriously? Seriously?
Just because they haven't been publicly filed, you don't think the Dole camp informs the NRSC as to its spending, intake, and cash-on-hand levels on a regular basis?
The NRSC knows every dime in Dole's account. If you think otherwise, you're naive.
Since you're mature enough to call me "the dumbest person on the Internet," seriously, why don't you do yourself a favor and just stop reading this blog?
Congratulations. You took one string that, on second thought, may not be the case and used it to ignore everything else I said. Let's say the NRSC knows. What does that change? Absolutely nothing.
It doesn't change the fact that you know nothing about how Dole has raised funds this quarter.
And it certainly doesn't change the fact that the fundraising quarter hasn't even completed yet.
Let me repeat that, since you have ignored it in four consecutive posts:
THE.
FIRST.
QUARTER.
HAS.
NOT.
FINISHED.
YET.
How is it even possible for you to comment on her fundraising when, not only do you not have any numbers to go by, but when fundraising for this quarter isn't even over yet?
The only thing you have to go on is the Roll Call article, an article which you either 1) didn't read, or 2) didn't understand. You have absolutely no legs to stand on when you say her fundraising is "languishing". Its an invention of truth (not the first one from this site), that you pulled out of the thin air. Stop being dishonest, and maybe I wouldn't have to hound you everytime you commit an egregious abortion of logic.
va blogger - so you're saying that the NRSC, which is currently begging the RNC for money, would beg other Senators to help Dole out if she was flush with cash? Holy cow. The fact that NRSC knows her numbers (it doesn't matter that I haven't seen her figures yet - the NRSC has!) and is begging others to contribute to Dole's campaign is a giant, neon "DANGER" sign. If you think otherwise, you're the one with rose-colored glasses stapled to your head.
It should be noted that nobody has used the word "begging" but you. And since you spin every single news item you post on your site, its most likely an inaccurate characterization.
Its not a hard thing to figure out. The RNC, by far, has more money than the NRSC, NRCC, or even the DNC, DSCC, or DCCC. It helped out individual candidates in 2006. Ensign is asking for a more direct partnership, and since the RNC chair is a fellow Senator (and one who benefitted from the NRSC to win his seat in '04), there's a decent chance it will happen. Asking for more money because he knows more money can only be good is not the same as begging. There's nothing to indicate that the NRSC is not getting the cash it needs.
Because of her donations to the NRSC last cycle, her CoH is very low; extra money from the NRSC will get her back up to where incumbents usually are, and Dole's fundraising will lift her up beyond that. Its not terribly difficult to understand.
So Ensign is trying to squeeze money out of the RNC - money that would otherwise go to advance GOP interests like electing a GOP President - to help his NRSC because they're doing really well?? Come on.
The article even says:
QUOTE
Historically, the RNC has done little to help individual Senate candidates in presidential election years...
UNQUOTE
This is a seemingly unprecedented ask for RNC help by the NRSC - and this early out to boot. The NRSC knows it's in terrible shape with only poor prospects ahead.
So you're wrong when you say "There's nothing to indicate that the NRSC is not getting the cash it needs." There is something to indicate that the NRSC doesn't have the cash it needs - it's panhandling to the RNC for more!!!!!
Why does Ensign's request for money automatically mean that there is a cause behind it? They raised $2.4 million in February, just a few hundred thousand behind the DSCC, and when you factor in the $6 million debt the DSCC has looming over its head, the NRSC has more net value. They're doing well. But if the NRSC had more money in 2006, they might have been able to save a few of the close races they lost; thus, why cruise on auto-pilot when you can be aggressive in raising funds?
Ensign knows that money will be key in a cycle with a map as difficult as this, and he's smart enough to realize (as most people should be) that if money is good, then more money is better.
You characterize it both as "begging" and as "panhandling", but there is nothing to back that up. There is nothing in the article posted, there is nothing in the latest round of fundraising numbers, and there is nothing from any other source--except a blogger who has a knee-jerk reaction to spin every piece of news that gets posted on his site.
The NRSC doesn't ask the RNC for money in Presidential years. Why? Because the RNC spends its money on a Presidential candidate.
So you tell me - what conceivable reason would Ensign have for asking the RNC to fork over money to the NRSC that would otherwise be spent on other GOP interests? You tell me.
(And don't answer "aggressive fundraising" because its not "fundraising" to take money from the RNC to pay for the NRSC - that's just a shell game - Ensign must be worried about financial levels.)
What do you mean, "for what reason"? The reason is to put more money into the coffers of the NRSC. How is this hard to understand?
To put money into the NRSC coffers by taking it directly out of the RNC coffers?
Does he think no one is noticing?
Is that the best you can come up with? Is that the best Ensign can do?
First of all, as the article makes sure to mention, its Martinez's decision whether to lend financial support to the NRSC. Ensign isn't "taking" anything. He's not breaking piggy banks, and it would help your understanding of this issue if you stopped trying to read more into it.
Second of all, "Does he think no one is watching?"---I don't know what that's supposed to mean. Are you under the impression that he's going to get in trouble by asking for financial support? Or are you asking if, when he commented to a reporter from The Hill about the story, he knew other people would find out about it? It seems kind of an odd question to ask, and I'm not sure what you're getting at.
Third, there is no "best I can do" in this. I'm trying to tell you how things are. You're trying to tell me how you want things to be.
Fourth, "Is that the best Ensign can do?" I'm not sure what that means, either. The equation is simple: money is good, more money is better. The best Ensign can do is get the most money for his cause. If asking for financial help gets more money, then to answer your question, yes, that's the best Ensign can do.
Post a Comment
<< Home